|
Posts with tag: political-blogs | Return to BloggersBlog.com Homepage
CBS Launches Political Hotsheet
CBS has launched a new blog called the Political Hotsheet. The first post talks about transitioning to the new blogs from two other blogs CBS used to cover the election. Now they sound focused on covering the new Obama administration.
For the past fifteen months, CBS News and CBSNews.com have been delivering all the campaign and political news, developments, and analysis on our Horserace and From The Road blogs.
The Horserace is over, and the time for governing is about to begin for a new president and a new congress. Today we're launching the Political Hotsheet, a new blog which will combine the best Washington reporting, analysis and observations from the correspondents and producers at CBS News and CBSNews.com, and partners like the Washington Post and Politico. We'll also point you to the must-read stories across the Web. The Hotsheet will bring it all together in one place.
From the transition to the incoming president's first 100 Days in office and beyond, we'll keep you up on the very latest happenings in what’s about to become one of the busiest and most closely-watched towns in the world. Hotsheet will chronicle the news from the White House, Congress and all the institutions in Washington during these historic and uncharted days.
There will still be plenty of interest in politics even though the election is over. However, it won't be quite the traffic monster it was in October and November of this year. CBS News is going from two political blogs to just the one. You should be able to watch traffic to political blogs like Huffingtonpost.com, politico.com and hotair.com fall steadily from their Fall election peaks on charts like this one.
Posted on December 4, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View)
| |
Pro-Hillary Bloggers Abandon Daily Kos
A growing number of Daily Kos diarists are leaving the Daily Kos blog in a protest over the blog's increasingly negative treatment of Hillary Clinton. A post by Alegre kicked off the writer's strike. You can read Allegre's post here on Taylor Marsh's blog, here on MyDD and here on the Daily Kos website.
The Moderate Voice explains why this is a significant issue even though it may not seem important to people who don't read political blogs.
To those who don't visit blogs or get their news from them (which a recent poll shows includes the vast majority of the American public) this might seem to be a provincial conflict, but it is highly significant.
In political terms, it underscores the raw, angry and bitter rivalrly between supporters of Obama and Clinton (as I noted in my appearance on CNN's blog segment last Sunday).
The mirror image distrust, hatred and dismissiveness felt by each side towards the others' candidates accentuates by the day - raising the authentic prospect that even in an awful economy the Democrats will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory - as some supporters of the losing nomination candidate stay home.
Barack Obama's campaign has been under fire for hate-filled comments made by his pastor. The Daily Kos blog has become extremely biased towards Senator Obama and against Senator Clinton. Pro-Clinton bloggers are leaving to go blogs like MyDD, Talk Left and other progressive blogs. ABC's Political Punch talked to Markos Moulitsas, the owner of Daily Kos. Moulitsas says the large number of bloggers leaving his blog is "great."
"First, these people should read up on the definition of 'strike.' What they're doing is a 'boycott.' But whatever they call it, I think it's great. It's a big Internet, so I hope they find what they're looking for."
Moulitsas sounds happy to see all the Hillary Clinton supporters go. More discussion of the Daily Kos writers' strike can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here.
Posted on March 15, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View)
| |
Political Blog Readers Skew Older
There are tons of political blogs on the Internet but not everyone is reading them according to a new study from Harris Interactive. Half of the Americans (56%) surveyed said they never read blogs that discuss politics. About one-quarter (23%) say that they read them several times a year and just 22% of Americans read political blogs regularly (several times a month or more).
One interesting part of the study is that political blog readers tend to be older than the typical blog reader - past blog studies have shown blogs are read more by young people. This study found that a higher percentage of baby boomers and seniors read political blogs than in the younger demographics. This is somewhat logical because many people don't become interested until politics they are older.
While it could be said that blogs are just a younger person's folly, in our study this is not the case. Just one in ten (19%) Echo Boomers (those aged 18-31) regularly read a political blog and only 17 percent of Gen Xers (those aged 32-43) say the same. Matures (those aged 63 and older) are actually the generation most likely to be political blog readers as just over one-quarter (26%) say they regularly do so followed by 23 percent of Baby Boomers (those aged 44-62). Also, one hears of the rabid blogs on both sides of the political aisle, but just 22 percent of Republicans and 20 percent of Democrats regularly read blogs. Independents are the ones slightly more likely to read these, as just over one-quarter (26%) say they regularly read political blogs.
Looking at those who regularly do read political blogs, over half (54%) read one or two at least once a week with an additional 22 percent reading 3-4 at least once a week. And, while they may read these, they do not comment on them. Over two-thirds (69%) of those who regularly read blogs did not comment on one in the previous week. Republicans are slightly more likely than Democrats to comment. One-third of Republicans (34%) commented in the previous week compared to 28 percent of Democrats.
Here is a chart showing this age group breakdown of political blog readership.
(via Hot Air)
Posted on March 10, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View)
| |
Campaign Blogger Pay
Blog P.I. has used the National Journal Beltway Blogroll's post about bloggers being paid by candidates to compile a list of bloggers being paid by candidates in blogger/advisor roles. Blog P.I. used a prorated salary to show who the best-paid campaign bloggers are for each party. By prorated salary they mean "that monthly (approximate) salaries have been prorated to annual salaries." You will see several prorated salaries in the $30,000 to $50,000 range for candidates in both parties. Blog P.I.'s list also includes lump sum payments that have been made to bloggers.
Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit says "My prediction -- it'll be a lot more in 2008." He's probably right. A political blogger with a popular blog and online contacts could make a good income working as a campaign blogger for one of the 2008 presidential candidates.
Posted on November 7, 2006
Permalink | | | Comments (View)
| |
Political Bloggers Planning Google Bombs
The National Journal (via MSNBC.com) reports that some political bloggers are planning strategic Google bombs that they hope will be seen by people searching for information about a candidate as the November elections draws closer. Wikipedia defines a Google bomb as "Internet slang for a certain kind of attempt to influence the ranking (called PageRank) of a given page in results returned by the Google search engine, often with humorous or political intentions." In this case the intentions are clearly political. The National Journal article says liberal bloggers came up with the idea first.
Liberal bloggers had the idea first. Chris Bowers of MyDD outlined the strategy Sunday. He said the plan involves purchasing "Google AdWords that will place each negative article on the most common searches for each Republican candidate. Simultaneously, I will produce an article on MyDD that embeds that negative article into a hyperlink."
Bowers asked bloggers to help add links, and they spent the next few days compiling negative news articles on Republican candidates in about 50 targeted races.
Conservative blogger John Hawkins of Right Wing News learned of the strategy and urged his allies to "fight fire with fire." Hawkins expressed concern the Google-bombing campaign just might work for Democrats.
"Who would be doing a Google search on a particular candidate in the final days of a campaign?" he wrote. "Probably an independent voter who is trying to get more information about a candidate. And if the first article he runs across is a brutal hit piece, well, that could be the information that helps him make up his mind."
You can see the call-to-action from Chris Bowers here on MyDD and here on DailyKos. Conservative blogger John Hawkins post on Right Wing News about a Republican Google bomb can be found here. Hawkins' post also reminds everyone of the Google bomb that turns up George Bush's bio when "miserable failure" is searched on Google. That particular google bomb still works today. Wikipedia has a list of several other political Google bombs.
Posted on October 25, 2006
Permalink | | | Comments (View)
| |
Cute Little Elephants and Donkeys Required on New Political Blogs
CNN has launched a new political blog called CNN Political Ticker. Political blogs are all the rage as the mid-term elections get closer. New York Magazine, MSNBC and The New York Times have all launched political blogs over the past few
weeks. MSNBC's First Read and the Times' The Caucus blogs also have similar cute looking elephants and donkeys in their graphical headers. They are all slightly different and CNN went for the neon look. Here are the headers from all three blogs all in a row.



Posted on September 26, 2006
Permalink | | | Comments (View)
| |
Liberal Bloggers to Meet in Las Vegas
A New York Times article says 1,000 liberal bloggers are getting together for a convention in Las Vegas. The event is being called the YearlyKos convention (a name familiar to DailyKos.com readers) and it will be attended by some top Democrats including Howard Dean, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi.
Las Vegas, as the ad campaign likes to remind us, is a place people go to untether themselves from reality — to become, if only for a weekend, anonymous and uncensored. It's odd, then, that Vegas is about to play host to a gathering of ordinary Americans whose objective is precisely the reverse. Next week, 1,000 devotees of the liberal blogging universe -- people who know one another only as pseudonyms on a screen, connected by only their running commentaries -- will descend on the Riviera Hotel in hopes of affixing names and faces to their online personas. The event has been dubbed the YearlyKos convention, and it is the first-ever corporeal assemblage of the bloggers at the Web site Dailykos.com. These are the people who are said to be changing the very nature of American politics, transforming the old smoke-filled room of insiders into an expansive chat room for anyone who wants in. And so it's not surprising that Democratic luminaries like the party's chairman, Howard Dean, and its leaders in Congress, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, have arranged their schedules to address the convention, along with at least a few 2008 presidential contenders. No small contingent of political professionals and journalists will show up as well. (I myself will sit on a panel about political journalism, which is kind of like being the Dunkin' Donuts spokesman at a cardiologists' convention.)
The Times article also said a few 2008 presidential candidates will also be at the convention. This shows how powerful political blogs have become. If you are cynical you might argue that this shows the power of conventions instead. The convention schedule can be found here. The convention blog says YealyKos is looking for IT volunteers. The convention will be held June 8-11 in Las Vegas.
Posted on May 28, 2006
Permalink | | | Comments (View)
| |
Jill Carroll Was Falsely Accused by Some Bloggers
A few right wing bloggers gave kidnapped Christian Science Monitor journalist Jill Carroll an unbelievably hard time over her kidnapping. These bloggers accused her of being a traitor and an America hater. In the end it turned out that Carroll was forced by her captives to make the propaganda tape in exchange for her release. The CS Monitor has a Jill Carroll update blog that provides information about her rescue and her return to the U.S. Ellen Goodman, a syndicated columnist, recently wrote that these bloggers owe Carroll an apology.
The printouts on my desk describe the 28-year-old journalist, a hostage and victim for 82 terrifying days, as something between Patty Hearst and Baghdad Jane, between a traitor and ''Princess Jill." TBone posted a potshot, calling Carroll ''a liar" and the kidnapping ''a total scam." PA Pundits said that ''I still just can't get past her being (for the most part) unharmed." And Debbie Schlussel called her a ''spoiled brat America-hater."
The blogosphere was not the only source of pollution. Indeed, the oil-spill prize goes to Don Imus's producer, Bernard McGuirk, who described this young reporter as ''the kind of woman who would wear one of those suicide vests. . . . She may be carrying Habib's baby." But in the short, volatile, and powerful life of the Web log, the Jill Carroll debacle may be a turning point.
Web logs have been around barely a half-dozen years. The Pew Internet & American Life Project estimates that a quarter of Internet users now read blogs and 9 percent write one. Most of the 28 million blogs are online diaries such as those on MySpace. But there is also the feisty political corner of this zone.
The political bloggers first flexed their muscle in 2002 when they trumped the MSM -- blogspeak for Mainstream Media -- by forcing Trent Lott out of the Senate speakership after he toasted the good old segregated days of Strom Thurmond. In 2004, they proved the power of the Internet as a great equalizer when they confronted the house of CBS and Dan Rather over Bush's military records.
Two years later, we have -- ready, fire, aim -- the Jill Carroll affair. These attacks raise the question of what bloggery is going to be when it grows up. An Internet op-ed page? Or a polarized, talk-radio food fight?
Some responses from the bloggers mentioned in Goodman's article can be found here and here. The question is why did these bloggers believe the propaganda tape in the first place? Why weren't they patient enough to wait for Jill Carroll's side of the story? Can these bloggers really expect to continue to have a readership beyond this incident? There were also right wing bloggers who gave Carroll the benefit of the doubt and waited for her story and there are many bloggers that remained supportive of Carroll. Right Wing Nut House has an insightful post about bloggers tendency to jump the gun on stories. Jumping the gun happens in all varieties of blogging, not just political blogs.
In people's haste to be first, or different, or just plain ornery and contrary (all the better to get links and readers) a culture of "shoot first and ask questions later" has arisen in the blogosphere that quite frankly, is proving every bad thing that the MSM has been saying about blogs from the beginning. Many of us - including myself - have been guilty in the past of hitting that "Publish" button when perhaps it would have been prudent and proper to take a beat or two to think about what we just wrote and the impact it might have beyond the small little world we inhabit in this corner of Blogland.
The Moderate Voice, which provides a in-depth article on this story, says a few of the bloggers that prejudged Carroll have apologized.
Posted on April 11, 2006
Permalink | | | Comments (View)
| |
Bloggers Cover Dick Cheney's Hunting Accident
Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot and injured his friend, 78-year-old attorney Harry Whittington, during a quail hunting trip over the
weekend in South Texas. Weekend bloggers got to the story first --
many blogs that only post during the week missed out on early coverage
of the breaking news story. Cheney now has two of the top five Technorati
searches and two of the top five "hot tags." Some of the focus in the blogosphere is on the fact that the story was not reported for nearly 24 hours. Others note that the injured lawyer is still hospitalized after being shot by Cheney in the face, neck and chest. There are also so many jokes in the blogosphere, including comparisons of Cheney and Elmer Fudd, that the late night comics may
have difficulty coming up with original material on Monday night. There are many well wishes for Mr. Whittington as well.
A Media Cynic post mentions the the quail hunting scene in Wedding Crashers. The Media Cynic also writes:
Yeah, I've heard of accidents like this happening, but only when everyone in the hunting party has had a few too many cocktails. After all, if you're sober and in broad daylight, a quail breaking cover from the ground and a 6' tall white guy don't look much alike.
Notice that a) the story wasn't reported until 24 hours after the accident
occurred and that b) Ms. Armstrong's statement blames the victim. But anyone
who's taken a hunting safety course knows that if you have a weapon it is your
job to know where your fellow hunters are at all times."
Michelle Malkin says
it is very bad news for the White House: "I'm very thankful Whittington is doing fine. Unfortunately, this is very bad news for the White House--and not just because of the inevitable late-night jokes that will inundate the airwaves over the next week. The Dems will exploit this accident to smear Cheney as incapable of being trusted, weak of mind, etc. The
resignation rumors will fly again. And the biography of a man who has served this country so well and so honorably for so many years will be overshadowed by a single, ill-fated hunting mishap."
A Daily Kos entry on
the incident has over three hundred comments.
Judeopundit downplays the incident: "Anyway, Malkin's concern is laudable, but this doesn't sound like such a big deal to me. Maybe Cheney could buy the guy a new orange vest."
Blogs for Bush blogs
that lefties are "bound to have a field day" with the news.
Waveflux:
"Whittington 'broke away'? How far did he go, and for how long? And to do what? Look for quail? Take a leak? Where was he in relation to Cheney? If he really didn't announce himself to the group upon returning, why not? Why wasn't Cheney keeping tabs on the location of others in his party, as you'd think a responsible hunter should?"
Al Franken has a post about Cheney's accidental shooting of his fellow hunter.
Raw Story reports that Pamela Willeford, the U.S. ambassador to Switzerland, was the third member of the hunting party.
Musing Minds says "accidents are accidents."
Frank James at The Swamp (Chicago Tribune) blogs what he thinks will be the main question the press asks the White House on Monday: "How is it that Vice President Cheney can shoot a man,
albeit accidentally, on Saturday during a hunting trip and the American public
not be informed of it until today? That will likely be the main question asked of the White House about the apparent accidental shooting of a 78-year-old man during a Texas hunting trip by the vice president."
UrbanGround blogs about the event being politicized: "I dont' know why this is such a big story though. It's an accident, not an incident. There are no political angles here. But that won't stop both sides of the aisle from making it into one (mostly the Left side making fun of Cheney for it, and then the Right coming to Cheney’s defense and reacting to the idiocy from the Left)."
Political Cortex: "So, what we have is an event shrouded in secrecy for almost twenty-four hours which, when disclosed, was accompanied by a fawning statement by a Bush apparachik exonerating Cheney from any and all blame and/or liability.Thus, this appears to be yet another example of the Bush Administration attempting to manipulate the press and perhaps hide the truth."
Left Coaster: "Leave it to Greg Mitchell over at Editor and Publisher tonight to ask how can it not be a big story when the Vice President shoots someone, even accidentally? And yet, if it hadn’t been for the ranch owner calling her friend at the local paper this morning and letting him know about it, this story wouldn’t have even come out today because the White House was willing to let it go unreported until the local paper went with it. The local sheriff was willing to let the Secret Service sweep this under the rug, like a Jenna and not-Jenna chugging contest."
Davezilla shows the difference between a hunter and a quail.
Oblogatory Anecdotes: "This will undoubtedly re-ignite the gun debate in this country and I’m sure Sarah Brady and the anti gun forces will take full advantaging of it. They have been waiting eagerly for a high profile incident like this to make their case that guns must be banned, because they can accidentally hurt people. The problem with this argument is that many things can hurt people that we do not ban." (via Publius Rendezvous)
Talking Points Memo blogs about the time delay from the White House and how shooting accidents are the shooters' fault not the victim's fault.
More coverage on:
Technorati: Cheney
Technorati: "cheney hunting"
Technorati Tag: Cheney
Technorati Tag: Dick Cheney
BlogPulse: Cheney
IceRocket.com: Cheney
Topix.net: Cheney
Yahoo News: Cheney
Posted on February 13, 2006
Permalink | | | Comments (View)
| |
|
|
The Writers Write Lifestyle Network
|
|