BloggersBlog.com
BloggersBlog.com
Homepage
Books about Blogging
Blogstorms
Categories
Linking to Us
Our Blogs
Recent Headlines
Resources
Search
Twitter
WWFeeds.com











Add to Google



Add to Technorati Favorites!



Text Ads



Categories
Advertising in Blogs
April Fool's Day
Awards
Baby Blogs
Bird Flu
Blog A-Lists
Blog Addiction
Blog Add-ons
Blog Fiction
Blogiversaries
Blogging for Money
Blog Comments
Blog Pessimism
Blogging Industry News
Blogging Tips
Blogging Tools
Blogosphere Highlights
Blogs for Sale
Blogstorms
Books
Celebrity Gossip Blogs
Censorship
Character Blogs
City Blogs
Consumer Blogs
Corporate Blogging
Crafts
Cyberbullying
Dating and Personals
Education
Entertainment Blogs
Events
Facebook
Family Blogs
Flogs
Food Blogs
Gadget Blogs
Games
General News
Green Blogs
Health
Holidays
Housing Bubble
International
Journalism
Lifestyle
Marketing and PR
Memediggers
Military Blogs
Mobile Blogging
Movies
Music
MySpace
New Blogs
Novices
Oddity
Personal Finance
Pets
PhotoBlogging
Podcasting
Politics
Privacy
Religion and Spirituality
RSS
Science Blogs
Search
Seniors
Social Networks
Spam and Splogs
Sports Blogs
Statistics
Stephen Colbert
Tech News
Teens
Travel Blogging
Twitter
Videos
Virtual Worlds
Widgets
Wikis
Women and Blogging
Work and Blogging




Our Blogs
Bloggers Blog
Crafters Craft
Drivers Drive
Fantasy SF Blog
Gamers Game
Health News Blog
HowToWeb.com
The IWJ Blog
Lovers Love
Media Cynic
Petosphere
Pleasant Morning Buzz
Readers Read
Science News Blog
Shopping Blog
Singers Sing
Sportsosphere
Surfers Surf
Traders Trade
Video Nacho
Watchers Watch
Workers Work
The Write News
Writer's Blog


Search

Web bloggersblog.com










Add to Technorati Favorites!



Watchers Watch (TM)



Home | Facebook
See Also: Social Networks | Profiles Search

OpenSocial Foundation Debuts With Yahoo Onboard

OpenSocialThe nonprofit OpenSocial Foundation has been launched. OpenSocial will provide a standard for the sharing of social network data using APIs.
It's like the Justice League of social media: Google, Yahoo, and News Corp.'s MySpace.com announced on Tuesday that they have formed the OpenSocial Foundation, a non-profit group to support the OpenSocial initiative that Google kick-started last year as a way to promote a universal standard for developer applications on social-networking sites.

The specific purpose of the new non-profit, according to a release, is "to ensure the neutrality and longevity of OpenSocial as an open, community-governed specification for building social applications across the web." It's a particularly crucial move for Google, which has been eager to emphasize that OpenSocial is a community standard, not a Mountain View project.

"OpenSocial has been a community-driven specification from the beginning," Joe Kraus, Google's director of product management, said in a joint statement from the three companies. "The formation of this foundation will ensure that it remains so in perpetuity. Developers and websites should feel secure that OpenSocial will be forever free and open."
Dan Holevoet explains the Gadget xml files that developers can use to create applications using OpenSocial data in this video.

Google has a post on the launch and so does Yahoo Anecdotal. Yahoo also has a press release announcing their support of OpenSocial.

Facebook isn't joining the party.
And Facebook won't be joining the OpenSocial Foundation, either. "As the largest contributor to the memecached system, Facebook has long been a leader and supporter of open source initiatives but will not join the foundation," a statement from the company read. "The company will continue to evaluate partnership opportunities that will benefit the 300,000 Facebook Platform developers while improving the Facebook user experience."
As Mashable notes OpenSocial includes a who's who of all the major social networks except for Facebook.
Bigger than the forming of the Foundation is the news that Yahoo has joined in on OpenSocial. For a reminder of who else is in, here's a shortened list: Engage.com, Friendster, hi5, Hyves, imeem, LinkedIn, MySpace, Ning, Oracle, orkut, Plaxo, Salesforce.com, Six Apart, Tianji, Viadeo, and XING. So, basically, out of all the social networks and web giants on the web, Facebook is the only one that's out of the loop - for now.
There are going to be some very interesting applications developed using OpenSocial. Facebook may come to regret not being involved. Of course, they could always join down the road as they observe how OpenSocial evolves as developers launch OpenSocial-based features and services.

Posted on March 25, 2008
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati



Mom and Dad Still May Want to Be Your Facebook Friend

FacebookSome journalists are apparently finding it hard to interview Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Maybe it is because they aren't geeky enough. Or, maybe some journalists just don't get Facebook or maybe there is nothing to get. Maybe Facebook is just another social network like the thousands of others out there. It just happens to be more popular. What journalists need to do sometimes is recycle old questions and old stories like this one from the Washington Post. Just because we have heard all the questions before doesn't mean they aren't still relevant. Let us recycle all the questions from MySpace's past and apply them to Facebook. Are parents joining to follow their kids? What is Facebook doing about predators? Are young people flocking away from Facebook to join other social networks?

The Washington Post got us started by bringing back the parents following their children on the social network story. Parents are apparently tired of the mystery and so many are trying to find out what their kids are up to on Facebook. The Washington Post reports that some teens and young adults are shocked to find their mom or dad trying to "friend" them on Facebook. Some are even finding their Mom or Dad friending their friends.
Across the country, Facebook users are contemplating similar questions when they log onto their accounts. More and more moms and dads are signing onto Facebook to keep up with their offspring. Not only are they friending (or attempting to friend) their sons and daughters, they're friending their sons' and daughters' friends.

Some, like Matt, take the requests in stride. He ultimately friended his dad. Others are less sanguine, voicing their dismay via online groups that decry parental intrusion and offer tips on how to screen out mom and dad. ("Just go onto their computers and delete their accounts." "Just don't add them as a friend or any1 that is a co-worker with ur parents duh.") Even parenting experts are getting involved, offering their own tips on proper Facebook etiquette.

"I do not know if this has happened to anybody, but this morning I log on to Facebook and I have a new friend request!" wrote 19-year-old Mike Yeamans, a sophomore at James Madison University, on one of several "No Parents on Facebook" groups that have popped up on the site. "I am excited to make a new friend so I click on the link. I could not believe what I saw. My father! This is an outrage!"
Some might argue that this means Facebook has jumped the shark. They might be right. If someday in the near future young people start complaining that their parents are following them on Twitter it could mean that many twittering teens are about to relocate. However, these same types of stories popped up a couple years ago with parents becoming the MySpace friends of their children. We've seen this all before. We've even seen this story before with Facebook and parents. Last June the New York Times ran a story called "omg my mom joined facebook!!" Today, MySpace is still going strong although one could argue that some of the younger people have gone elsewhere. Facebook seems to be holding onto its young users. Most 20-somethings can probably deal with the idea of parents on Facebook but parental intrusion might discourage some of the younger Facebook users who just aren't interested in having their parents as Facebook friends.

Posted on March 9, 2008
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

Facebook Anthem Viral Suggests Some Are Getting Bored of Facebook

This amusing video (hat tip allfacebook) called the Facebook Anthem suggests that at least some Facebook users are growing tired of certain aspects of Facebook. The viral video - which sounds very similar to this viral video - blames the more gimmicky side of Facebook for the boredom - the applications, pop quizzes, fortune cookies, status updates, sticky notes, virtual gifts, superpoke, iq tests, etc. In the end Facebook is primarily a communication tool and all the add-on features may be annoying to some Facebook users. Some people are probably also tired of viral videos like Facebook Anthem. Both Facebook and viral videos are likely to continue to remain popular at least for the near future - maybe even until 2013.



Posted on February 29, 2008
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati



Will Young People Still Care About Facebook in 2013?

FacebookThere are some stories here, here, here and here that the traffic to Facebook might be falling or plateauing in the U.S. and/or in the UK. Webware notes that it was never going to be possible for Facebook to sustain its explosive 200,000 new members per day growth forever.
It's inevitable that the explosive expansion that Facebook experienced in 2007 can't possibly go on forever. And since no hot new destination has popped up to potentially suck away Facebook traffic, the obvious conclusion is to blame it on social-networking fatigue. Facebook, one could say, is a trend and users have simply grown tired of it.

The argument makes sense. For many there was an initial novelty to keeping in touch with faraway friends and classmates, wasting time at the office with games and other developer-created applications, and voyeuristically sifting through online photo albums all on a single destination site. Me, I've grown tired of the Scrabulous gaming application on Facebook--it's way more fun to play word games in person.

But an apparent leveling in traffic doesn't equal mass account deletion. "Coolness factor" always fades; now it's up to Facebook to prove it can stay relevant and useful in its post-expansion era. Remember when instant-messaging client adoption was soaring and people were IMing each other just for the heck of it? We're all still IMing, but it's no longer a novelty, it's a utility. ("Utility," by the way, appears to be one of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg's favorite words.)
Robert Scoble thinks Facebook is not doomed but it is really too early to know for sure. What we really need to know is how many active members there are at MySpace, Facebook or Bebo. Will users of these sites dump them for another service or for privacy as they get older? Facebook isn't so over dude today but what about five years from now. Five years ago who would have believed young people would stop using email? Will today's Webkinz-using grade school students really want Facebook accounts when they reach high school and college age or will they seek out new destinations of their own that people in their 30s and 40s don't get? There is no real way to answer that question until a few years have passed but there have been many warnings against building a service that primarily targets the very young. If the next generation doesn't want Facebook then as big as Facebook has become they could still end up being beaten by Classmates.com or slowly become as uninteresting as GeoCities.

Posted on February 22, 2008
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

Beacon: The Eye of Facebook

Eye of SauronFacebook first took a beating when its Beacon service was ruining Christmas by broadcasting information about gifts Facebook users had just purchased to all of their Facebook friends. But this was just scratching the surface of larger invasion of privacy issues with Beacon. We blogged earlier that Facebook's Beacon remained a problem because it was continuing to gather information about Facebook users even after they provided a way for people to keep details about their purchases from hitting Facebook's news stream. Beacon was a pretty clever name for Facebook's invasive new feature. A Beacon sounds kind, helpful and friendly. Something more sinister like the Eye of Facebook might have been a better name for Facebook's feature that gathers packets of information about you as you surf the web and sends them back to Facebook with no additional benefit to you whatsoever. Facebook is trying to use Beacon - it's all seeing eye - as a way to see much more of what you do on the Internet while still retaining its "walled garden" business model.

Here are some of the more recent stories on Facebook's Beacon.

  • The CA Security Advisor Research Blog provides evidence that Facebook continues tracking users who opt out as well as users that aren't even logged in to Facebook.
  • The New York Times Bits blog says Coca-Cola has decided not to use Beacon for now. Coca-Cola says they were told it was an opt-in service. This has many wondering whether Facebook lied to its advertisers.
  • Scott Karp says Facebook acted like it had a monopoly and treated its users like "'brainless meat for the grinder' - kind of like TV networks did when they force fed us 3-4 for minutes of mind-numbing commercials."
  • A Webomatica post contains a list of some of the companies that are possibly using Beacon. The post also lists some methods for blocking the Beacon while still keeping your Facebook account.
  • Even deleting your Facebook account may not help -- it may not be easy to do either.
  • Bubblegeneration writes that some of the pressure for Facebook to monetize is coming from investors. "There's another side to this story as well. I'm not sure how much pressure Facebook is getting from investors to "monetize". I'd wager that it's a great deal indeed."
  • Meanwhile, Facebook tried unsuccessfully to get some documents about Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerburg removed from the 02138mag.com website. There's some juicy irony there with Facebook trying to have information removed from the Internet while they are blocking their users from removing information.
  • Between the Lines: "Some people make the case that most Facebook users don't care about the privacy issues, but a company that claims to be user-centric but blatantly makes decisions that are by far in the best interest of advertisers eventually is broadly painted as a untrustworthy. A lack of character rots a company (or country) from the inside out, and there are plenty of competitors ready to ascend the mountain."
  • There is much more discussion on Techmeme and Megite.

    Update: Paid Content says Overstock.com and Travelocity are also not using Facebook Beacon: "Overstock.com suspended the Beacon program on Nov. 21, and as of Friday, hadn't reinstated it, according to Mediapost. Also Travelocity, although touted by Facebook as a launch advertiser, was troubled enough by the program that it had not started using it as of Thursday."

    Posted on December 2, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati



  • One Way to Completely Opt-out of Beacon: Delete Your Account

    FacebookWe blogged earlier about Facebook's annoying Beacon. Facebook's Beacon was instantly broadcasting information about Facebook users' online purchases without first getting the users' permission to do so. Facebook ruined some people's holiday gift surprises in the process. In response to numerous complaints the social network giant has now modified the way the Beacon news stream functions. Beacon "news items" will now sit waiting on Facebook users' profiles until they are approved or denied. This at least provides a way for Facebook users to stop information about online purchases and other web activities from being instantly broadcasted to all of their Facebook friends.

    Unfortunately, it doesn't really solve the larger issue with Beacon which is that Beacon is aggregating its users online shopping activity. Is there any benefit to consumers in having Facebook compile all this data? The only benefit appears to be to Facebook which will be able to build a constantly improving model of each Facebook user's shopping behavior. Facebook seems to think they deserve to gather this information about their users simply because they provide them with a free online social networking profile. Facebook is going to really struggle as a company going forward if the only method they have for making money is to violate more and more of their users' privacy while providing no additional benefit to the users. Facebook is refusing to provide a way to completely opt-out of Beacon so the only way users can get away from Facebook's invasive new service is to delete their account.

    Posted on November 29, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Facebook's Beacon Shines Annoying Light on Consumer Purchases

    Facebook's supposedly innovative new advertising feature called Beacon is quickly turning into a disaster for the popular social network. The feature annoys users and ruins the holiday experience by broadcasting Facebook users' recent product purchases such as books, movies, apparel and other gifts. The federal government might be disturbingly interested in people's book purchases but consumers don't necessarily want information about the goods and services they have just purchased broadcasted for everyone to see. Another problem with Facebook's Beacon is that they made the service opt-out instead of opt-in. Facebook users are forced to turn the Beacon off at every single online retailer that is connected to Facebook Beacon. Facebook apparently fixed a "glitch" that made the opt-out switch nearly impossible to find but the problem remains because the problem is Beacon itself.

    The Beacon problem is turning into a big PR disaster for Facebook. Moveon.org is speaking out against Facebook's Beacon. New articles are being written daily about how Facebook is ruining Christmas and Hanukkah. Here's a sample of some of the recent headlines.

  • Facebook May Become the Grinch that Stole Christmas
  • Facebook Users Light a Beacon of Protest
  • Facebook is Accused of Spoiling Christmas Spirit
  • Privacy Groups Ready FTC Complaint Against Facebook

    That's not the kind of PR any kind of company wants especially this time of year. The negative publicity is mounting so quickly that Facebook may soon be forced to admit failure and turn off the Beacon - darkening its unwanted bright spotlight on consumer purchases. This is the information age and a vast wealth of information is available but not every information source should be broadcasted. Would you want a public stream of your American Express purchases? Your tax returns? Your doctor visits? Social media does not have to be synonymous with "no privacy" - some information streams should not be turned on. Facebook should at the very least make it opt-in - check this box to annoy your Facebook friends with information about all of your online purchases.

    Posted on November 28, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

  • Syria Blocks Facebook

    Reuters is reporting that Syria's government has blocked access to Facebook. There are thousands of Syrians who use Facebook accordign to the Reuters story.
    Syrian users of Facebook said on Friday the authorities had blocked access to the social network Web site as part of a crackdown on political activism on the Internet.

    "Facebook helped further civil society in Syria and form civic groups outside government control. This is why it has been banned," women's rights advocate Dania al-Sharif told Reuters.

    "They cut off communications between us and the outside world. We are used to this behavior from our government," said Mais al-Sharbaji, who set up a Facebook group for amateur Syrian photographers.

    There was no comment form the government, which has intensified a campaign against bloggers, virtual opinion forums and independent media sites in recent months.
    Syria may have agreed to attend Tuesday's Middle-East peace conference in Annapolis, Maryland but they appear to be very serious about silencing opposing political points of view. Ammar al-Qurabi, head of the National Association for Human Rights, told Reuters that there is even a "Internet political crimes" ward at one of Syria's prison. An article on Human Rights Watch says Syria's approach to Internet access is consistent "with its efforts to suppress all forms of expression deemed critical of how the country is governed. All newspapers and broadcast media are tightly controlled, and hundreds of political prisoners remain behind bars, many of them serving long terms for peaceful dissent."

    Posted on November 25, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati



    Microsoft Buys Tiny Stake in Facebook For $240 Million

    Facebook MicrosoftThe New York Times reports that Microsoft has purchased a 1.6% stake in the Facebook social network for $240 million. The investment gives Facebook an extremely large valuation: $15 billion.
    The two companies said on Wednesday that Microsoft would invest $240 million for a 1.6 percent stake in Facebook. The investment values the three-year-old Facebook, which will bring in about $150 million in revenue this year, at $15 billion.

    The deal ends two months of jockeying between three major Internet players for the right to invest in and forge close ties with Facebook.

    As part of the deal, Microsoft will sell the banner ads appearing on Facebook outside of the United States, splitting the revenue with it. Last year, Microsoft struck a deal with Facebook to run banner ads on the site in the United States through 2011.

    The astronomical valuation for Facebook is evidence that Microsoft executives believed they could not afford to lose out on the deal. Google appears to be building a dominant position in the race to serve advertisements online. Fearing it might lose control over the next generation of computer users, Microsoft has been trying to match and in some cases block Google's plans, even if that effort is costly.
    The Times article says Facebook has annual revenues of $150 million a year so the $15 billion valuation is 100 times its annual revenues. It's hard to see how this is not an overpayment on Microsoft's behalf but they do need to keep Google away from Facebook and News Corp. already has its social network investment with MySpace. The Microsoft-Facebook news is being discussed heavily in tech blogs as you can see on the Techmeme and Megite memetrackers.

    Posted on October 24, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    MySpace Wants Third Party Widgets

    MySpaceMySpace isn't going to let Facebook have all the fun. The BBC reports that MySpace is also going to be opening up their social network to third-party apps.
    The move brings the website into line with rival Facebook, which has seen strong growth since it opened up to outside programmers.

    Facebook has become a portal for services such as video, audio and photos since the change.

    MySpace has more than 188 million registered users, compared to the 47 million who use Facebook.

    MySpace was bought by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp for $580m in 2005.

    "We hoped it would do very well, but we never imagined it would do this well," Mr Murdoch told the Web 2.0 conference in San Francisco on Wednesday.
    Third party applications can be built really fast and they can take off very quickly. It was only a few months ago - May of this year - that Facebook opened up its social network to third party apps. Just a month or so after that MySpace was reported to be jealous of Facebook's apps. Wired's Compiler blog says the platform will be opened in the next couple of months. MySpace has nearly four times the amount of users as Facebook so Facebook's several month head start in the widget wars probably isn't much of a lead at all.

    Posted on October 18, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Facebook Makes Faces Viewable to Public

    Facebook is making its millions of users' faces available to the public. They have added a search on the Facebook.com homepage. A post on GigaOm explains Facebook's Public Search Listings.
    If you thought the news feed was a threat to your privacy, be warned: Facebook is announcing Public Search Listings today, meaning profiles will be searchable through Facebook, and soon turn up on Google, Yahoo and MSN Search.

    As of tomorrow, search will be available through Facebook; users will then have one month to change their privacy settings before profiles get indexed by the major search engines. These results will include, at most, your name and profile picture.

    Obviously that's a move that could scare some users, and there are some restrictions: you must have your profile set to viewable by "everyone" in order to appear, and only your limited profile will be public.
    Facebook Public Search


    Mashable says Facebook users will have about a month to change their privacy settings before Facebook user faces and names start showing up in the major search engines. Some Facebook users that want their privacy may complain that Facebook should have made this opt-in instead of opt-out. Providing the majority of Facebook users don't change their privacy setting it will allow Facebook to compete more with some of the popular people search tools. It will also allow Facebook profiles to become more indexed in the major search engines resulting in increased traffic for Facebook.com.

    Posted on September 5, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Parents, Roomates, College Bound Freshman and Facebook

    USA Today has an interesting story about how parents are investigating their college-bound child's future roommate on Facebook. Some of the parents are not liking what they see and are requesting a roommate change with the college.
    As housing officials at colleges around the country send out roommate assignments to freshmen this summer, a growing number of schools say they're getting more requests for changes - from parents who don't like the roommates' Facebook profiles.

    "They were getting an impression - false or accurate - of what the student would be like to live with," says Magda Manetas of The College of New Jersey in Ewing.

    About a dozen other colleges contacted by USA TODAY report similar complaints. And this may be just the beginning: Some schools already have mailed roommate assignments for fall, but many more say they will be sending them out in the next few weeks.

    Housing officials say parents who cite Facebook most frequently mention party-related content and photos as their primary concerns. Parents sometimes see cups in photos and make the leap to alcohol and drugs, Manetas says.

    But Robin Berkowitz-Smith of Syracuse University says race, religion and sexual orientation are the top three concerns from parents contacting officials there.
    Once again social networks are having a major impact on the lives of young adults and their parents. The temptation to investigate their child's future roommate is probably too difficult to avoid. There is the possibility that some of the change requests are being made by the parent on behalf of their child. In this case it may actually prevent a roommate change that would have happened anyway after a difficult first few weeks. There is also simply some nosey parental interference going on here.

    Posted on August 9, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati



    Large Traffic Jumps for Social Networks Over Past Year

    The chart below from a ComScore press release (via Read/WriteWeb) shows the amazing growth some of the largest social networks have achieved over the past twelve months.

    Total Unique Visitors (000)
    Social Networking Site Jun-06 Jun-07 % Change
    MySpace 66,401 114,147 72
    Facebook 14,083 52,167 270
    Hi5 18,098 28,174 56
    Friendster 14,917 24,675 65
    Orkut 14,917 24,120 78
    Bebo 6,694 18,200 172
    Tagged 1,506 13,167 774


    The list does not include all the social networks only those selected by ComScore that had over 10 million visits and at least 50 percent growth during the past year and are of particular significance to the North American region.

    ComScore credits international growth for the large increases in visitors at these social networks. MySpace clearly remains the leader as far as visitors goes. Facebook showed the most impressive growth and Tagged came out of nowhere to be one of the top sites. Friendster and Orkut are still hanging in there with nearly 25 million monthly visitors each.

    Posted on August 8, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    MySpace Envious Of Facebook's Widget Success

    MySpaceThe Financial Times is reporting that MySpace is making plans to open its network to allow outside companies to create widgets just like Facebook recently did. Facebook's widget move was considered a big success and it sounds like MySpace is not about to let the move go unchallenged.
    The expected change in approach is a reaction to the success of rival Facebook, which last month unveiled a similar step to open its network to outside developers. Although it has less than half as many users as MySpace in the US, Facebook's approach has won it strong backing from other consumer internet companies, which hope it will give them an easier way to reach the network's 27m members.

    More than 1,000 applications and services are already available, letting users do things like publish slideshows of personal pictures to their Facebook pages, or add a box that keeps track of when their favourite bands are playing concerts nearby.

    "The [Facebook] platform is interesting," Mr DeWolfe said in an interview with the Financial Times. He argued MySpace's current technology approach gave its users many of the same benefits but said: "We'll probably offer users the choice of both."

    The aim was to attract more online companies to create services for MySpace's users. "We'll be bringing in more developers."
    If MySpace opens it doors wider to developers it will be interesting to see which companies benefit. iLike, which provides a music widget, was one of the suprises after Facebook opened its doors to developers. iLike started adding 300,000 users daily (hat tip Online Media Cultist) from Facebook users adding the iLike widget to their profiles.

    Posted on June 30, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Study: Facebook Users More Likely to Attend College

    A new study has found that Facebook users are more likely to go to college than MySpace users.
    Fans of MySpace and Facebook are divided by much more than which music they like, suggests a study.

    A six-month research project has revealed a sharp division along class lines among the American teenagers flocking to the social network sites.

    The research suggests those using Facebook come from wealthier homes and are more likely to attend college.

    By contrast, MySpace users tend to get a job after finishing high school rather than continue their education.
    MySpace is bigger than Facebook. Facebook has also targeted college students with .edu addresses in the past. These may be two reasons for the class divide in the two websites. They were built differently and so the audience and user base is much different.

    Dana Boyd's fascinating article, Viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace, explains how the two social networks are attracting different users. According to Boyd Facebook is getting the goodie two shoe kids while MySpace is getting the alternative, immigrant, emos, goths, artsy, etc. kids.
    The goodie two shoes, jocks, athletes, or other "good" kids are now going to Facebook. These kids tend to come from families who emphasize education and going to college. They are part of what we'd call hegemonic society. They are primarily white, but not exclusively. They are in honors classes, looking forward to the prom, and live in a world dictated by after school activities.

    MySpace is still home for Latino/Hispanic teens, immigrant teens, "burnouts," "alternative kids," "art fags," punks, emos, goths, gangstas, queer kids, and other kids who didn't play into the dominant high school popularity paradigm. These are kids whose parents didn't go to college, who are expected to get a job when they finish high school. These are the teens who plan to go into the military immediately after schools. Teens who are really into music or in a band are also on MySpace. MySpace has most of the kids who are socially ostracized at school because they are geeks, freaks, or queers.
    Boyd also discusses how the look of each website may be attracting different types of users.
    Most teens who exclusively use Facebook are familiar with and have an opinion about MySpace. These teens are very aware of MySpace and they often have a negative opinion about it. They see it as gaudy, immature, and "so middle school." They prefer the "clean" look of Facebook, noting that it is more mature and that MySpace is "so lame." What hegemonic teens call gaudy can also be labeled as "glitzy" or "bling" or "fly" (or what my generation would call "phat") by subaltern teens. Terms like "bling" come out of hip-hop culture where showy, sparkly, brash visual displays are acceptable and valued. The look and feel of MySpace resonates far better with subaltern communities than it does with the upwardly mobile hegemonic teens. This is even clear in the blogosphere where people talk about how gauche MySpace is while commending Facebook on its aesthetics. I'm sure that a visual analyst would be able to explain how classed aesthetics are, but aesthetics are more than simply the "eye of the beholder" - they are culturally narrated and replicated. That "clean" or "modern" look of Facebook is akin to West Elm or Pottery Barn or any poshy Scandinavian design house (that I admit I'm drawn to) while the more flashy look of MySpace resembles the Las Vegas imagery that attracts millions every year. I suspect that lifestyles have aesthetic values and that these are being reproduced on MySpace and Facebook.
    Facebook appears to be more for the mainstream while MySpace appears to more for those intentionally bucking the mainstream or unintentionally caught outside of the mainstream because of a their class background. There are likely many people who also use both and have friends that use both of the popular social networks. These differences between the two sites exist but it isn't a clean divide. Just because someone uses MySpace doesn't mean they aren't emo or a jock and there are geeks that use Facebook. There are lots of reasons why people gravitate towards different websites. Everything from the look of the website to where their friends are. You can read much more discussion of this story here on Techmeme. These distinctions between the two social networks may mean young people are less likely to abandon a specific social network than previously thought.

    Posted on June 25, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Facebook To Let Companies Establish Special Pages

    FacebookThe Wall Street Journal reports that Facebook is going to open up its website up to corporations and organizations. In other words, non-faces will soon be able to establish "special pages" within Facebook.
    On Thursday, the Palo Alto, Calif., company will announce a new strategy to let other companies provide their services on special pages within its popular Web site. These companies will be able to link into Facebook users' networks of online friends, according to people familiar with the matter.

    For instance, an online retailer could build a service in Facebook to let people recommend music or books to their friends, based on the relationships they've already established on the site. Or a media company could let groups of users share news articles with each other on a page inside Facebook.

    Previously some companies have had pages within Facebook, but they didn't interact with the Web site's user networks. This move is significant because it could turn Facebook into a central hub for Web users, akin to an Internet portal like Yahoo Inc. Rather than using Facebook only to keep in touch with friends and going elsewhere for other content, users could now gain access to that content inside Facebook. That could keep people on Facebook for longer periods of time, which would also appeal to advertisers.

    It's unclear how exactly Facebook plans to make money from the platform strategy, but one person familiar with the matter says the firm currently has no plans to share revenue with the companies that develop services to run on Facebook's platform. In that case, the main draw for companies that put their services on the site would be visibility and access to users of the Facebook site.
    Will these "special page" also allow companies to add friends like they can on MySpace or Twitter? MySpace has many pages that were established by companies, movies, rock bands and corporate brands. As time goes by the leading social networks seem to becoming more and more alike. The WSJ article says Facebook has 23 million users and adds a staggering 100,000 new users daily. There should plenty of companies interested in reaching Facebook's massive user base.

    There are lingering questions about whether a company like Google will buy Facebook or whether Facebook will head to IPO-ville. This latest move seems to take Facebook on a more independent path.

    Posted on May 21, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Facebook to Allow Outside Widgets?

    FacebookWired's Listening Post has blogged that popular social networking website Facebook is going to open up and allow outside widgets onto people's Facebook profiles.
    A trusted source tells me that the online social networking site Facebook plans to open its tightly controlled site to outside widgets, allowing users to embed outside audio, video, and other content onto their profile pages for the first time. Ironically, this move comes just as MySpace tightens up its widget policies, meaning that the two sites could come to resemble each other a lot more than they do now.
    If this happens it would be a big opportunity for widget providers to get their widgets in Facebook. MySpace started with open doors and has been getting more restrictive on widgets and third-party hosting services. The latest incident was MySpace's blocking of Photobucket's videos. If the widget news is true it would also be a big step in Facebook's apparent move toward becoming more and more like the other social networks. That move began last year when Facebook opened its virtual doors to more faces -- not just high school and college students and alumni.

    Posted on April 17, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Using Web 2.0 To Spy on Those We Dislike

    Jen Gerson writes in the Toronto Star that she uses Facebook to spy on someone she disliked it High School.
    I found him on Facebook.

    He's chubby now, sports a cubic zirconia in one ear and a thin beard trimmed tight around the jaw. For religious views, he writes: "SMOKE WEED EVERY DAY." Favourite books: "hahahahahahahahahaha. Who has time to read?" He says he's an exotic dancer at Chip & Dales where he works "as eye candy for money."

    This is the guy who tormented me in high school.

    He called me a dork. He reminded me daily of how few people liked me. He accused me of being a lesbian in biology class.

    His Facebook profile has become a source of constant comfort. Whenever I feel disliked or dorky, I look at his page. His lack of success in life fills me with petty glee.

    Unlike others in Generation Y, I use Facebook for more nefarious purposes than just keeping track of my acquaintances or inviting people to parties or sharing photos. I am a shameless snoop. I use it to spy and I'm not afraid to admit it.
    That's one way to cheer yourself up. Jen Gerson not alone in using Web 2.0 resources this way although she is braver than most people in that she admits it. Gerson also writes, "I'm less worried about this than I am about a generation that thinks nothing about putting video cameras on every street corner. I'm worried that we're making ourselves vulnerable to government and corporations who will use our indiscretion to quietly wrest our privacy from us." She is right to worry that marketing firms could datamine this information to compile detailed information about individuals and market products to them. Many of today's youth are oblivious to privacy concerns.

    Posted on April 3, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Facebook Churns Out Big Numbers

    Venturebeat has an article on Facebook and it looks like strong growth is continues on the social network. Facebook is claiming 1.5 billion daily pageviews and 20 million registered users.
    Facebook tells us the site is seeing about 1.5 billion page views a day, up from about 1 billion daily views last month - statistics that haven't been released until now. That's a huge jump.

    First, myself and non-college friends appear to be getting more unsolicited invites from others - including those not in school - to connect on Facebook. Facebook is going mainstream.
    Facebook's user and traffic growth is impressive but the Venturebeat article also looks like at Facebook's API called Facebook Developers that could provide additional growth for the company.
    But there’s an undercurrent of development happening, suggesting Facebook may be seeing serious momentum in other ways. It's old news that Facebook opened its application programming interface last year, which lets software developers outside Facebook build other applications on top of Facebook's platform and data. The open project is called the Facebook Platform. But Facebook’s growth over the past several months, and improvement to its API policy, deserve attention.

    Imagine Facebook user profiles and networks everywhere. In a suite of office software. In an online classroom. In a family's entertainment system. In whatever application developers choose to connect with.
    Facebook users are going to have to not mind that their data is pulled out for use in other applications but so far that doesn't appear to be a problem. Venturebeat's article also lists several companies looking to use data and/or build applications from Facebook including Mosoto, Slide, Jobster and Auctomatic.

    Posted on March 30, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Two Celebrity Gossip Blogs Among Females Aged 17-25 Favorite Sites

    Emarketer is reporting on a recent Youth Trends study of 17-to-25-year-olds. For both males and females Facebook was the number one website. What's most interesting about the study is that two blogs were among the top ten most popular website for females aged 17 to 25. The two blogs (both celebrity gossip blogs) are Pink Is the New Blog and What Would Tyler Durden Do. In case you don't know Tyler Durden is a character from the Fight Club movie.
    The survey is conducted quarterly, and the previous quarter marked the first time that Facebook was tops among both women and men.

    Two blogs were in the female top 10 list for the first time: Pink Is the New Blog and What Would Tyler Durden Do? (WWTDD). Both blogs have an entertainment/gossip focus, which Mr. Weil says "is consistent with Gen Y females' current adoration with content surrounding celebrities and their 'uh oh' moments."

    MySpace was second on the top 10 list for females, but it remained sixth for males, with the percentage of 17-to-25-year-old males listing it as their favorite moving up slightly from 13% in the previous quarterly listing to 14%.
    Blogs are getting very popular if they are now among the top websites young people visit. It is surprising that the Perez Hilton blog was not one of the the top sites as it is often referred to as the most popular celebrity blog.

    Posted on March 10, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Virtual Gifts as a Serious Business Model?

    Facebook IconsFacebook has added virtual gift giving to its popular social network. Sending your first Facebook gift, which is represented by a small icon, is free. All future virtual gifts cost $1 each. The icons designed by Susan Kare are very cute and the net proceeds for the month of February go to the breast cancer research charity, Komen for the Cure.

    It is great while the icon revenues benefit Komen for the Cure but is there really any long term potential here for Facebook to bring in revenues by selling virtual gifts? Will people really pay real money to send a virtual cupcake or virtual roll of toilet paper to a coworker, friend or secret love? Michael Arrington at TechCrunch seriously thinks people are ready to spend their hard-earned money on Facebook icons.
    In a brilliant marketing move to kick this off, Facebook is donating the February net proceeds from the virtual gifts to charity. After that, they're keeping the money. I would expect this to be a significant revenue generator for them by year-end.

    The reason I say this is because "poking" is already such a big activity on Facebook, where you reach out to other users. When you pay money to do the same thing, it will mean more, and people will be sucked into doing it. If and when Facebook launches premium gifts, people will be buying those, too. I'd also expect them to sell really high end "limited edition" icons as well in limited supplies.
    Are virtual icons really a serious business model when you can easily email images and photos at anytime; place photographs on your blog or profile and use icons during chat and IM sessions? A lot of social networks give you a lot more for free. Myyearbook.com is far ahead of other social networks in the Valentine's Day icons and images tricks department -- on their Pimp.MyYearbook.com section they've got a v-day word generator, candy hearts, falling Valentine's Day objects and other graphics goodies -- all for free.

    Posted on February 8, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    September Traffic Drops for MySpace, Facebook and YouTube

    AdWeek reports that MySpace, Facebook and YouTube saw traffic drops in September that could be related to kids returning to school and starting homework.
    Visitors to social network heavyweight MySpace dropped to 47.2 million in September from 49.2 million in August, a 4 percent decline, per Nielsen//NetRatings. The decrease was more striking at YouTube, which Google just agreed to acquire for $1.65 billion [Adweek Online, Oct. 9]. Compared to August, traffic in September fell 19 percent to 27.6 million.

    Corinna Chang, a Nielsen//NetRatings data analyst, said the traffic dips could be attributed to the start of the school year, when "activities like blogging and video searching would experience a decrease as students are focusing on schoolwork and not leisure activities." She noted that overall Web traffic slipped in September.

    Social networks have enjoyed a tremendous run in 2006. Since the start of the year, MySpace traffic has grown 65 percent and YouTube's has increased eightfold. The hefty price paid by Google for YouTube was attributed to the buyer's confidence that it could effectively integrate advertising into the site's existing user-friendly features.

    While Nielsen//NetRatings detected a decline in the unique visitors to these sites, it reports they continue to keep visitors for long periods. Average time spent by MySpace visitors in September was just over two hours, a slight increase from August. On YouTube, visitors stayed 33 minutes, up from 26 minutes the previous month.
    The article also said that Facebook's visitor counts dropped 12% in September. Maybe this will give Friendster and myYearbook a chance to move higher in the social network traffic rankings.

    Posted on October 21, 2006
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Social Networks and Interpersonal Intelligence

    The Associated Press reports that some individuals are turning away from the social networks in favor of face-to-face meetings.
    For some, it would be unthinkable – certain social suicide. But Gabe Henderson is finding freedom in a recent decision: He canceled his MySpace account.

    No longer enthralled with the world of social networking, the 26-year-old graduate student pulled the plug after realizing that a lot of the online friends he had accumulated were really just acquaintances.

    He's also phasing out his profile on Facebook, a popular social networking site that, like others, allows users to create profiles, swap message and share photos - all with the goal of expanding their circle of online friends.

    "The superficial emptiness clouded the excitement I had once felt," Mr. Henderson wrote in a column in the student newspaper at Iowa State University, where he studies history. "It seems we have lost, to some degree, that special depth that true friendship entails."
    Simply dropping social network profiles may be unusual but some experts believe there could be a return back to face-to-face communication as the buzz over social networks wears off. A happy medium between real and virtual communications will eventually be established. Dr. Michael Bugeja, director of Iowa State's journalism school and author of Interpersonal Divide: The Search for Community in a Technological Age, told the AP that he lectures students about "interpersonal intelligence."
    Though he's not anti-technology, Dr. Bugeja often lectures students about "interpersonal intelligence" - knowing when, where and for what purpose technology is most appropriate.

    He points out the students he's seen walking across campus, holding hands with significant others while talking on cellphones to someone else. He's also observed them in coffee shops, surrounded by people, but staring instead at a computer screen.

    "True friends," he tells them, "need to learn when to stop blogging and go across campus to help a friend."
    Other social network users have found that people aren't nearly as exciting or interesting as they sound on their profile.
    Steve Miller, a sophomore at Rollins College in Winter Park, Fla., joined Facebook as a way to meet people, but also quickly learned that it had limitations, too.

    "I discovered, after meeting many of these [online] friends, that a good Facebook profile could make even the most boring person somewhat interesting," says Mr. Miller.
    The article also says some people use social networks as a way to avoid social confrontations.
    "Text messaging has become the easy way out," Mr. Miller says.

    He's had friends cancel a night out with a text message to avoid having to explain. He's also seen some people ask for dates via text to escape the humiliation of hearing a "no" on the phone or in person.

    "Our generation needs to get over this fear of confrontation and rejection," he says.
    Looked at this way social networks could also make it easier for the other person to say "no." On the positive side at least people are using the social networks to set up actual dates in the real world. It is really up to today's youth to decide how much time they will ultimately spend with IMs, social networks, video games and persistent worlds. However, there have already been reported problems in the workplace with Gen Y workers who focus too much on chatty IMs and not enough on face-to-face meetings with coworkers and the boss. It will be important for today's kids to embrace Dr. Bugeja's interpersonal intelligence idea and understand when and why it is the appropriate time for a text message, IM, handshake, hug or face-to-face talk.

    Posted on October 10, 2006
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Grownups Flock to Social Networks

    Teenagers now share social networking hubs with people in their 30s, 40s and 50s according to a new report from comScore. The average age on MySpace is now 35 and 68% of MySpace users are 25 and older. Social networks like Facebook and Friendster also show an aging demographic trend. MediaWeek has an article analyzing the new comScore study.
    For example, according to comScore, 68 percent of the 55 million MySpace users are 25 and older, while 71 percent of the 1 million users on the declining Friendster fall within the same demographic. Even Facebook, which up until recently was limited to college and high school students, boasts of a growing audience 15 million users - 50 percent of whom are 25-plus. Contrasty, the smaller and less popular Xanga.com is considerably younger, as 20 percent of its 8.1 million user base falls within the 12-17 demographic.

    The relative aging of the giant social networks indicates that their recent exponential growth has been driven by new and older Web users discovering the phenomenon. For example, back in August of 2005, teens made up a quarter of the MySpace audience. Now that group represents just 12 percent of users. During the same period, the middle-aged crowd has been gravitating to the site in droves: adults 35-54 now make up more than 40 percent of the site, up 8 percentage points in the last year.
    Here is a chart from the Comscore press release that shows the demographics for four social networks. For people 55 and over the percentages are much less than the total Internet percentage of seniors. Demographics for social networks are aging but seniors have not yet caught the trend as much as the younger age groups.

    Total Internet MySpace Facebook Friendster Xanga
    Unique Visitors (000) 173,407 55,778 14,782 1,043 8,066
    Total Audience 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
    Persons: 12-17 9.6% 11.9% 14.0% 10.6% 20.3%
    Persons: 18-24 11.3% 18.1% 34.0% 15.6% 15.5%
    Persons: 25-34 14.5% 16.7% 8.6% 28.2% 11.0%
    Persons: 35-54 38.5% 40.6% 33.5% 34.5% 35.6%
    Persons: 55+ 18.0% 11.0% 7.6% 8.1% 7.3%


    This trend at the top social networks is sure to send the young teens elsewhere to a new place with less grownups. The Associated Press also has a story about comScore's report. John DeMayo doesn't buy the numbers. DeMayo is correct that if you run MySpace zip code queries there are many less MySpace profiles for the 35+ demographic.

    Posted on October 6, 2006
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Facebook Opens Doors For New Faces

    FacebookFacebook has opened its virtual doors to a much wider web audience. You no longer have to be an active high school or college student (or an alumni with a school email) but you do have to be 18 or over to register under Facebook's "none of the above" broad category. This was an anticipated move. Many had speculated that Facebook would open its doors to the Internet masses in a move to compete with MySpace.com and other social networks. Facebook has blogged about its much broader policy.
    You've heard it before, and you'll hear it again; here at Facebook, we want to help people understand their world. We started at one school, and realized over and over again that this site was useful to everyone—not just to Harvard students, not just to college students, not just to students, not just to former students. We’ve kept growing to accommodate this fact.

    This includes your friends who graduated pre-Facebook (yes, there was such a time), your friends who don't have school or work email addresses, and your friends whose schools don't give out email addresses. Now you can all connect.

    This doesn't mean that anyone can see your profile, however. Your profile is just as closed off as it ever was. Our network structure is not going away. College and work networks still require an authenticated email address to join. Only people in your networks and confirmed friends can see your profile.
    If you already have a Facebook profile that you don't want all the new Facebook users to be able to see you can learn how to restrict the viewage of your profile to specific networks on Facebook's privacy page. Facebook says you can even control who finds and sees you using Facebook's search tool: "You can control who can find you in searches. You can also control what is in your search listing, and whether people who can see your listing can message, poke and add you as a friend."

    You need to be logged in to see some of the Facebook profiles. You can see part of founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg's profile without being registered. However, you have to be logged in to see Facebook's "notorious" resident blogger, Carolyn Abram. Note: Carolyn is selective in choosing her Facebook friends and recently rejected 80 friend requests. She is also the only Facebook Blog blogger who is carrying a large object in her photo.

    Posted on September 27, 2006
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Will Facebook, Technorati or YouTube be the Next Big Web 2.0 Sale?

    Facebook Technorati YouTubeBloggers are discussing a possible Yahoo bid to buy Facebook. The New York Times (on News.com) reports that Yahoo's offer for Facebook was $900 million -- higher than Viacom's January offer but lower than Facebook's $2 billion goal.
    When Viacom offered $750 million for Facebook in January, he asked for $2 billion and was rebuffed, according to a person involved in the negotiations. Now, he remains undecided about the latest offer, made in the last few weeks by Yahoo. That offer, first reported by The Wall Street Journal, was confirmed Thursday by two industry executives, one briefed on the deal by Facebook and the other by Yahoo. Both spoke on the condition of anonymity because the negotiations are continuing.

    To woo Zuckerberg, Yahoo has offered about $900 million for Facebook and says it will keep the company somewhat independent, with Zuckerberg in charge. This has been its model with other acquisitions like Flickr, a photo-sharing site, and Del.icio.us, a social bookmarking service that lets members share lists of their favorite Web sites.
    Paid Content has more about some of the rumors going on about Yahoo and Facebook. Meanwhile, a New York Post story, discussed on hundreds of tech blogs including Charlene Li, GigaOM, B2Day and Internet 2.0, puts YouTube's magic acquisition number at $1.5 billion. Less than that and they won't sell. Should Yahoo just add $600 million to their latest Facebook offer and buy YouTube instead?

    Last year and earlier this year there were many sale rumors about Technorati. At one point a rumor suggested that Technorati had actually been sold and everyone was trying to find out who the buyer was. Lately there haven't been as many Technorati rumors. The rumors are primarily about YouTube, Facebook and other social networks and video sharing sites. It would be easy to speculate again that maybe Yahoo will buy Technorati since they recently mysteriously removed their blog search engine from Yahoo News. However, this would be pure speculation. It also seems unlikely they are planning on buying Technorati since they are looking to spend so much on a Facebook buy ... but if the Facebook deal doesn't pan out then maybe they will spend the money elsewhere. Many bloggers speculated in their 2006 predictions that Technorati would be sold this year -- see Blogspotting, rev2.org, Newsome.org, Blog Herald and Ruzee. We mentioned it in our predictions as well. There was also a post on TechCrunch in January called, When Will Yahoo Acquire Technorati?. So far this sale has not materialized and time is running out for an acquisition to happen in 2006.

    Posted on September 22, 2006
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Chase in Exclusive Credit Card Deal with Facebook

    Facebook and ChaseThe Wall Street Journal reports that credit card companies have noticed social networks and that J.P. Morgan Chase division will be offering its credit card in an exclusive deal with Facebook, a social network popular with college students.
    Banner ads on the site will invite users to join a social network -- on Facebook -- of people interested in learning about or signing up for credit-card services. Members of the group will be able to earn reward points by signing up for a card, paying a bill on time or other activities. The points can be used to make a charitable donation, Mr. Field says, or might be redeemed by members in a fraternity for a TV set for the frat house.
    It sounds like a good way to get college kids to accumulate debt. Credit card companies never miss a good opportunity to offer credit cards to college kids. Are they still giving away free t-shirts to spring breakers if you sign up for a credit card? Expect deals like this to be quickly echoed by other social networks and credit companies. (via Techdirt)

    Posted on August 21, 2006
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    College Orientations Now Include Social Network Warnings

    USA Today has an interesting article about how college orientations this fall include warnings about the dangers of blogs and social networks. The students are also told about how students can later came to regret postings and profiles they have made.
    From large public schools such as Western Kentucky to smaller private ones like Birmingham-Southern and Smith, colleges around the country have revamped their orientation talks to students and parents to include online behavior. Others, Susquehanna University and Washington University in St. Louis among them, have new role-playing skits on the topic that students will watch and then break into smaller groups to discuss.

    Facebook, geared toward college students and boasting 7.5 million registered users, is a particular focus. But students are also hearing stories about those who came to regret postings to other online venues, from party photos on sites such as Webshots.com to comments about professors in blogs.

    "The particular focus is the public nature of this," said Tracy Tyree, Susquehanna's dean of student life. "That seems to be what surprises students most. They think of it as part of their own little world, not a bigger electronic world."
    Hopefully, they are also telling students that everyone from police to potential employers have used blogs and social networks to find out more information about individuals. And what about videos and YouTube? User-submitted videos could potentially be considerably more embarrassing and career harming.

    The impact and popularity of social networks is remarkable. The article says that incoming freshman to one college already met online before school began and formed a Class of 2010 group on Facebook.
    The sites actually help with one of the major goals of orientation: bonding. At Birmingham Southern, dozens of members of the incoming class of about 350 had already formed a Class of 2010 Facebook group long before the start of school.

    "That's great," said Renie Moss, the school's dean of students. "That's what should be happening, forming that camaraderie. But we're hoping to just maybe give the students a moment to pause and make sure they put out something they can be proud of."
    That's probably happening already at many colleges -- freshman showing up at college having already made new friends online during the summer.

    Posted on August 4, 2006
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Facebook Pursues Corporate America

    Facebook LogoInside Facebook reports that Facebook has started offering its social networking service to large corporations. Only people with emails at ten pre-selected corporations, including Amazon, Gap and Microsoft, are allowed to register so far. One non-profit, Teach for America, was also invited to the small rollout.
    How will this affect the millions of students already on the service? I suspect that Facebook will work hard to make sure that the corporate crowd stays in one corner and the college crowd in another as much as they can–no 19 year old likes getting "poked" by someone in their 40's–just as they have done with the recent expansion into high schools. As long as Facebook stays safe for students, expanding into the corporate world should not adversely affect their dominance in the college and high school markets.

    How popular will Facebook be with corporate users? While the rollout will likely create buzz in some circles, I don't think you'll see the same phenomenal viral exponent or use patterns over time. Professionals just don't talk to dozens of classmates a day or live in dorms with hundreds of peers, and they certainly don't have 51 minutes a day to spend looking at cute members of the opposite sex and writing on each others' walls... I'm lucky if I see my friends at Apple once a month.
    Inside Facebook has a point but there are already other social networking services chasing Corporate America. Visible Path and LinkedIn were two that were discussed in Business Week's recent MySpace for the Office article.

    Posted on April 27, 2006
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google Blog Search | Technorati

    Facebook Raises $25 Million. Takes Down For Sale Sign.

    Facebook LogoSilicon Beat reports that Facebook has raised $25 million. The social network site also denied the $2 billion acquisition rumor.
    "It has never been our intention to sell the company," said Melanie Deitch, Facebook's director of marketing, adding that the latest funding puts the rumors of such a sale to rest. Late last month, Business Week reported the company had turned down a buyout offer for $750 million and was looking for as much as $2 billion, citing analysts saying that Viacom, owner of MTV, might make a good match.

    David Sze, the venture capitalist who led the investment for Greylock, said earlier statistics from comScore showing a decline in unique visitors in February were an aberration, and that the company's internal statistics show continued robust growth. Indeed, the March statistics showed resumed growth on this metric too. We've mentioned David Sze's penchant for wonkish analytical circle- and matrix-drawing before here. We asked David where Facebook fits within his "matrix." He responded that Facebook is a "winner-circle" company. (Sigh, guess you had to be there.)
    Bambi Francisco blogs (thx Social Customer) that Facebook had a "$525 million pre-money valuation." Facebook is extremely popular among college and high school students. However, they won't be able to compete with MySpace's traffic without opening up their services to people who are not currently attending high school or college. They may not need to compete with MySpace if they can continue attracting a high rate of high school and college students. One option Facebook might take is to continue as a closed network and offer profiles to high school and college graduates. If they do this they will be entering in competition with subscription charging sites like Classmates.com and Reunion.com. Note: Facebook currently allows college alumni but only students with a college affiliated alumni email account can register. Only fairly recent college graduates are even going to have a college email account.

    Posted on April 19, 2006