A BBC article says hungreds of Blogger blogs have been spammed with short posts containing a link to booby-trapped downloads that can be used to take over a Windows PC.
Security researcher Alex Eckelberry from Sunbelt Software first noticed the booby-trapped links turning up on Blogger on 27 August.
Now many hundreds of blogs on the site have been updated with a short entry containing the link.
Mr Eckelberry said it was not yet clear how the links were posted to blogs. The bogus entries could have exploited a Blogger feature that lets users e-mail entries to their journal.
The blogs themselves could also be fake and set up solely to act as hosts for spam.
The article says Google has yet to respond to the numerous unwanted blog posts appearing on Blogger blogs. Mashable says the entries are being posted to some of Blogger's many spam blogs. Google needs to regain control of Blogger's spam problems before confused web surfers are taken advantage of by these spammers.
The people behind the popular Boing Boing blog have decided to take on blogs like Engadget, Gizmodo and the other gadget blogs. You can see a longer list of gadget blogs here on HowToWeb.com. Boing Boing's gadget blog is called Boing Boing Gadgets or bbGadgets for short. Boing Boing co-founder Mark Frauenfelder announced the launch of the new blog and says Joel Johnson, a former Gizmodo editor and Dethroner founder, will be editing Boing Boing's gadget blog.
Our third major change is the launch of a brand new blog: Gadgets.boingboing.net. While Boing Boing has always covered personal technology, the four of us (Cory, David, Xeni, and I) believed a critical, intelligent, optimistic, and selective blog about personal technology and consumer electronics would be a fine addition to Boing Boing. But who could we trust to oversee a tech blog that the four of us would want to read? Actually, it wasn't hard to find that person. We went straight to Joel Johnson, a former Gizmodo editor and founder of Dethroner. Joel is smart, funny, knowledgeable, and curious about technology. He was our first, and unanimous, choice to run Gadgets.boingboing.net. And we're grateful he agreed to come on board.
Other changes on Boing Boing include a cleaner look and the return of comments. Teresa Nielsen Hayden, who has a blog called Making Light, will be managing Boing Boing's comments and community.
Bloglines has released a beta version of its popular web-based news aggregator. You can find the beta version at beta.bloglines.com. The old version will continue to be available at www.bloglines.com.
The new Bloglines has an Ajax interface with three seperate views for reading feeds: a quick view (just headlines); a full view that shows the full feed; and a 3-pane view that shows headlines on the top and the full stories below. This is the 3-pane view shown in the screenshot below.
You can also customize a start page that will load your favorite feeds instantly. For more details read this comprehensive post about the Blogline beta from Read/Write Web. Read/Write Web also says more features are coming from Bloglines.
There are more features to come, as Beta Bloglines is iterated on - including new options for saving, sending and sharing posts, as well as building link blogs, managing blog rolls, etc. Also coming soon is upgraded developer APIs. One of the more exciting future features from my point of view will be Personalization Preferences, allowing users to edit a feed or settings.
Some people have been switching away from Bloglines to other readers like NetVibes and Google Reader over the past year or so. The upgrade from Bloglines was long overdue. The new reader should make people some who have left Bloglines consider returning. Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Land says he is "personally strongly considering switching back to Bloglines from Google Reader." ResourceShelf also has an informative post about the upgraded reader.
LOLMSM! The Wall Street Journal has a news story about LOLcats and the popular I Can Has Cheezburger? website. The article details Eric Nakagawa's success with the icanhascheezburger.com website and lists some of the numerous LOLcats spinoffs. So, technically it does qualify as a business article even though they put it in a column called "Time Waster."
Mr. Nakagawa's simple Web site has become the center of the "LOLcats" phenomenon, a booming online subculture built around digital images and deliberately bad grammar. There's not much to it: Take a digital photo -- often one of household pets, particularly cats -- and purposefully place misspelled text on top. Anyone with elementary skills in Adobe's Photoshop or Microsoft's Paint software can make their own.
Nearly nine months after launching icanhascheezburger.com, Mr. Nakagawa's site receives around 200,000 unique visitors and a half-million page views each day, according to Mr. Nakagawa.
Visitors can browse a sprawling gallery of lolcats, vote for their favorites and post comments. Mr. Nakagawa says he receives up to 500 submissions a day, thanks in no small part to his site's tool that helps people build their own. He says every entry is screened for merit and originality before earning inclusion.
Only 12 or so submissions make the gallery a day. "It's ridiculous," Mr. Nakagawa admits, "but we do go through all of them." He certainly has the time. Revenue from ads on the site is "more than enough to pay my bills."
We blogged about the site's growing traffic and income in an earlier post. The Wall Street Journal Lolcats story is interesting and it also has some good resources and links. The best thing about it was that they posted it on Caturday.
So what's next for the Wall Street Journal - the major business newspaper turned pop culture and web humor rag? A front page story on Charlie the Unicorn? A detailed analysis of the dramatic chipmunk? An LOLbiz section? Time will tell.
Some other blogs covering the Wall Street Journal's coverage of the lolcats can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. There is also a thread here on Techmeme.
InfoWorld has an article that discusses Google's latest round of Blogger bugs. In addition to pointing out the need for "professional-grade uptime" from Blogger the article also talks about Blogger now allowing video uploads. This post on Blogger Buzz also discusses Blogger's video upload feature.
Today we are releasing video uploading to Blogger! This feature allows you to upload videos and create a video podcast with the same ease that we currently provide with photo uploading.
When you go to the Blogger post editor, you'll see a new button () next to the image uploading one. Just select a video from your computer, wait a few minutes for the upload and processing to occur, and voila! Now when you visit your blog, you will see something like this (of course without Tomo, the Blogger Akita):
The Blogger Buzz example features an uploaded video of the Blogger dog Tomo. Videos uploaded with Blogger are hosted by Google Video. However, Google says videos uploaded to Blogger are kept private and are not part of the Google Video search. Blogger also provides a video upload resource and a video uploading faq.
The New York Times has launched a personalized news start page called MyTimes. It's located at http://my.nytimes.com. MyTimes is currently running in beta. Silicon Valley Insider blogs that the service provides similar features that are common on other web portals.
MyTimes, in other words, appears to provide much of the functionality that portals like Yahoo began offering circa 1996. If the Times had rolled the feature out in 1995, therefore, who knows where its online presence would be today--probably a good deal larger than the 14 million uniques it currently has. Unfortunately, MyTimes does not seem to offer much that a committed NYTimes.com browser could already find on the site, and its feature set as a start-page almost certainly falls short of those offered by Yahoo, Google, NetVibes, and the dozens of other "My" portals out there, at which most Internet users have already established a presence.
MyTimes lets you add rss feeds from your favorite sources. Some of the New York Times journalists have also listed some of their favorite blogs and feeds.
TechDirt also points out that the service is similar to other portals. The New York Times MyTimes definitely copies some of the features already found on other Internet start pages but the Times has a captive audience so it probably makes sense for them to take advantage of it in this manner. The Times may also have many visitors that are less web savvy than the average NetVibes user so it is possible some of the features on MyTimes will be new to them. However, they aren't likely to win many converts that are already happy with existing start pages like My Yahoo, NetVibes and iGoogle. You can find a list of more start pages here.
YouTube blogs that they have started running YouTube InVideo ads on some of the YouTube videos for "select partners."
Over the past few weeks, you may have noticed that we've been working with select partners to improve YouTube's presentation of advertising on their videos in a manner that brings you creative, compelling content and should also increase revenue flow to artists and content owners.
So what's new? Today we're offering select partners the ability to incorporate YouTube InVideo ads into their content. These are animated overlays that appear on the bottom 20 percent of a video. If you're interested by what you see there, clicking on the overlay launches a deeper interactive video ad that we think is relevant and entertaining. (The video you were watching is temporarily paused.) If you choose not to click on the overlay, it will simply disappear, so that you're in full control of your YouTube experience.
Google spent a long time trying to come up with this ad concept and it seems like they went for a concept that is fairly unobtrusive. The ads can easily be turned off and appear at the bottom of videos. A last100 post which says the YouTube ads "are not that bad" has screenshots of a few of the ads including an ad for The Simpsons movie that shows Homer chasing after a donut. The Homer donut ad can be seen on Madina Lake's "House of Cards" music video. The Crime Mob - Rock Yo Hips music video contains an ad from Warner Brothers. The YouTube ads start up 15 seconds into the video and take up the bottom 20% of the screen.
The San Francisco Chronicle and New York Times have more details about the YouTube ad concept. The comments on YouTube's post about the ads range from those grudgingly accepting the ads to outright annoyance.
Some people will tolerate the ads:
jernov: "i personally don't like it that much, but it's better than an advertisement movie playing in front of the video you want to see, making you wait for the whole thing to start. i don't like it, but it could be worse."
123woow: "i think its a good idea people will see the advertisements more often and they cant really complain about it annoying them or being intrusive to the video because you can manually click it away easily. Good job YouTube"
randiicom: "I'm okay with this, but eventually it would get boring. I wouldn't subscribe to anyone who does this, but it wouldn't stop me from watching one of their videos. It'd be great though to get money for the videos you've made."
The negative comments indicate some YouTube users may even unsubscribe from videos that contain the ads.
johnbrouwer1: "It wrecks your youtube video! Terrible TERRIBLE idea!"
sjmaerz: "I knew the team at Google would find a way to screw this up. Goodbye, YouTube, it was fun while it lasted."
splitforces: "gawd advertising is in everything now. first it wuz comerrcials in the middle of my shows and now the middle of my fav online videos. i shall unsubscribe to any1 who would do that."
losereligionrem: "sounds dumb... if i wanted to see advertisement... i'd just watch tv..."
Updates: CNET says Matt Harding from the popular "Where the Hell is Matt?" videos doesn't like the new YouTube ads. And a post on Wired's Epicenter blog says the Chief Marketing Officer from VideoEgg says Google's new YouTube video ads are just like theirs.
Google has announced the launch of its embeddable maps feature that makes it easy to post a map on a blog or website.
Today we're excited to announce a new feature on Google Maps that allows you to add maps to your blog or website just by copying and pasting a snippet of HTML. And once you embed the map, it has all the same functionality of the Google Maps you know and love; it's clickable, draggable, and zoomable.
Adding a map to your website or blog is now as easy as embedding a YouTube video. No programming skills are required, and there's no need to sign up for a Maps API key.
Embedding the code is easy to do. You just look for the "Link to this page" on the top right-hand corner of Google Maps and then cut and paste the code. Here is a map of New York City as an example. The embeddable maps offer many of the the same features found at maps.google.com website.
Google Maps Mania says geo searches are also embeddable. As we mentioned before there are a lot of potential uses of this service such as providing a map on a travel-related entry or posting directions to a concert or conference.
Steve Rubel, the blogger at Micropersuasion, has an article in Ad Age today that talks about the trend towards bite-sized nuggets of information and bite-sized applications. He says the web is "increasingly becoming decentralized" and marketers and web publishers need to make use of this trend. If you have been witnessing the explosion of widgets and microblogging tools you are no doubt already aware of this trend. In the article Rubel tells marketers to make everything portable.
Make everything portable. The next version of the Macintosh operating system, due out in October, has a small feature called Web Clip that turns any part of a site into a widget that lives on the consumer's desktop. This is a big sign of things to come.
In the very near future portals including iGoogle, My Yahoo and Netvibes as well as social networks will be able to easily inhale the smallest pieces of content from across the web. Don't wait. Start now to make everything on your website embeddable. Traffic is becoming something that happens elsewhere, not just on your site.
Apple's Web Clip feature sounds fine providing they have the publisher's permission to snag anything it wants from a publisher's website. Rubel is right about the current trend. Marketers and publishers that don't take advantage of widgets and RSS technologies may eventually be ignored by web users actively using tools like NetVibes and iGoogle. It's the old "get on board or get left behind" thing happening on the Internet once again. This doesn't mean that content producers necessarily have to come up with their own widgets. A lot of the current applications (and future applications) make great use of RSS feeds so just publishing an RSS feed will make your site's content available to users. Another example is that publishers creating video content can use YouTube or other video sharing technologies that make it easy for people to embed their videos. There are a lot of great tools out there that publishers can take advantage of.
A short entry on OxfordMail.net says the Oxford University Press is searching the blogosphere to find new words.
Staff at Oxford University Press have started monitoring the use of English in web logs to find new words.
Lexicographers responsible for updating the Oxford English Corpus, which provides the basis for its dictionaries, will trawl through some 70 million 'blogs' in their search.
And with 120,000 new ones created every day, they may be in for quite a search.
A Guardian books blog post also discusses the decision by the Oxford University Press (OUP) to monitor "the use of English in weblogs." They also provide this recently published list from OUP of the 15 most frequently blogged words.
15 Most Frequently Blogged Words
blogger
blog
stupid
me
myself
my
oh
yeah
ok
post
stuff
lovely
update
nice
shit
These words don't exactly make us bloggers sound like masters of prose. In addition to scouring the blogosphere for new words the Oxford University Press also has a blog of its very own.
Here's a great example about how YouTube is becoming the top choice when people search for videos - at least funny ones. A Hitwise entry shows that searches for "funny videos" have been falling while search for "youtube" have become more frequent.
Muhammad Saleem notes that while we can't forget the "correlation doesn't imply causation" rule from statistics class there does seem to be a correlation in this case. Note: This data is UK specific so it may not correlate with search trends in the U.S. and other countries.
Billiam, a snowman living in Point Hope, Alaska, was one of the Americans asking questiions during the Democratic CNN/YouTube Debate that took place in July. In the first debate Billiam asked a question about global warming. GOP candidates been slow to sign up for the Republican YouTube Debate. One of the GOP holdouts, Republican Candidate Mitt Romney, went beyond simply holding out and leveled a huge insult on Billiam the Snowman. Romney said, "I think the presidency ought to be held at a higher level than having to answer questions from a snowman."
Romney, the lone GOP holdout, has posted more videos on his YouTube channel (283 as of Sunday afternoon) than any other presidential candidate, Republican or Democrat. But he has resisted the debate, in which videotaped questions are submitted through YouTube. In an interview with Manchester Union Leader, Romney said, "I think the presidency ought to be held at a higher level than having to answer questions from a snowman."
That drew a video response from Billiam, the snowman who questioned the Democrats on global warming last month in their YouTube debate. This time, he riffed on another Romney quote from the campaign: "Lighten up slightly."
Sources at CNN said the debate, co-hosted with the Republican Party of Florida, will be held at the Mahaffey Theatre in St. Petersburg. Steve Grove, head of news and politics at YouTube, said that more than 1,100 videos have been submitted, and the popular video-sharing site will allow YouTube users to upload their videos until Nov. 27.
Billiam formulated a clever response to Mitt Romney which can be seen here or below.
Billiam and his son Billiam Jr. have received both criticism and support (see here, here, here, here and here). Some people are even trying to save Billiam by with t-shirts. Billiam was created by two St. Olaf college students. There is a silly, absurd quality to the snowman questioner but the question itself is legitimate. Americans want to know the GOP candidates' positions on the serious issue of global warming. The YouTube debates have already generated a lot of great content and discussion and a GOP debate would put more helpful information out there for voters.
GOP candidates John McCain and Rudy Giuliani have already signed on according to CNET. This may have been in response to questions posted by conservative blogs like this post from Pajamas Media that asked, "Are the GOP Candidates Afraid of a Snowman?"
Now that McCain and Giuliani will attend hopefully the rest of the GOP candidates will too. The Republican CNN/YouTube Debate has been pushed back to November 28th, 2007 -- originally it was set for September 17th. Ron Paul, Mike Huckabee and Tommy Thompson had confirmed for the earlier date. Thompson has since pulled out of the race. Huckabee did well at the Iowa Straw Poll so hopefully he will attend the later date. Ron Paul has been a social media sensation so it seems likely he would attend providing he remains in the race. Fred Thompson has not yet agreed to attend the GOP YouTube Debate but there are lingering questions about whether Fred Thompson plans to run. Mitt Romney was directly challenged by Billiam and surely he would not backdown from such a challenge?
Using the power of Billiam CNN and YouTube may be able to get most or all of the GOP candidates to attend. People can submit questions on YouTube up until the November 28th date.
Writers Write, Inc., the parent company of BloggersBlog.com, has added a new blog to its blog network called FantasySFBlog.com. Fantasy/SF Blog is a daily blog covering what's new and interesting in the worlds of fantasy, SF, and horror, including books, movies, TV and gaming.
APC reports that Google is going to be launching an embed feature for Google Maps that will make it as easy to embed in your blog as a YouTube video clip.
Google Australia this morning showed a new iteration of Google Maps, launching about a week from now.
First up, if you know how to embed a YouTube video in your blog, you'll be able to embed Google Maps in your website, Google promises.
It'll be as simple as cutting and pasting a bit of HTML code into your website, just like a YouTube video.
The embedded maps have the full functionality of Google Maps -- they provide satellite view, map view or hybrid view, and users can click and drag the maps around.
To embed a Google Map, you pull up the map you want to embed--it can be a location, a business, series of driving directions, or a My Map you've created--and then click "Link to this page" and copy and paste the HTML into your website or blog. The embedded map will be fully interactive--you can drag and click or zoom in on a location, and view it in map, satellite, and hybrid modes,
This sounds like it could be a great feature for blogs. If you are talking about an event such a concert or conference an embeddable map could keep the viewer on your site while they use the map. They would also be useful for current events to pinpoint the location. It would be useful to have a map to show visitors when blogging about breaking news events like the Minnesota bridge collapse or the trapped Utah coal miners story. The maps would also obviously be very useful for travel blogs.
Update 8-15-07: Google Operating System discusses a couple services that already let you embed Google Maps: Map Generator and My Maps Plus.
Sometimes amateur videos can generate quite a following. The Battle at Kruger is an amazing 8-minute video shot by US tourist Dave Budzinski at South Africa's Kruger National Park. The video has been linked to by over 3,000 blogs according to Technorati. The video shows a complex battle between a lion pride, a herd of buffalo, and 2 crocodiles at a watering hole. You can watch the video below or view it on YouTube.com.
The BBC reports that the video is fast become one of the biggest web video hits.
An amateur video of an amazing animal confrontation on the African savannah is fast becoming one of the biggest hits on video-sharing website YouTube.
The footage first shows how several lions attack a group of buffalo, snatching a buffalo calf.
As the lions wrestle with a calf by a watering hole, a crocodile joins in the battle, pouncing on the buffalo.
The lions win the tug-of-war, but then the buffalo herd returns, chasing away the lions and freeing the calf.
The current count for the Battle at Kruger on YouTube is over 12.5 million views. What's also interesting is the broad international viewership of the video. If you click on the little honors link on the YouTube page it shows the video has been popular all over the world including Ireland, Spain, France, Italy, Poland and Brazil. This international viewership is clearly helping the video generate so many views. The video is also rapidly moving up YouTube's all-time viewed list. The Battle of Kruger is currently 31st on the all-time viewed list. It still has a ways to go to catch Judson Laipply's Evolution of Dance which has over 55 million views.
A new blog called Office Snapshots is posting photographs of the corporate workspaces. The blog is biased towards the workspaces of web and technology companies. Here is a brief summary of the blog from the blog's website.
Office Snapshots shows you the inside of the offices you care about. This will generally be from Web/Tech companies, and perhaps larger companies that people will be familiar with.
TechCrunch blogged yesterday that AOL might kill the Digg-like community built on Netscape.com and redirect traffic to this Netscape portal site on AOL.com instead. However, AOL quickly refuted this as a possibility. Netscape blogs they are alive and kicking and plan to continue the community.
Gloomy news indeed--if any of it were substantiated. As the head of the non-freaked-out editorial department, let me say a few things. AOL did just launch a Netscape-branded portal, designed to accommodate those members who don't wish to participate in a social news site. (Those members also have the option of using a personalized portal over at My.Netscape, not to mention the regular AOL portal itself.) No doubt some members will jump ship. But since the social news version of Netscape launched more than a year ago, most of the people with a yen for an old-fashioned portal have already left. Certainly the 323,589 individuals (as of this moment) who have joined the community didn't do so simply to check the weather and headlines.
Our director, Tom Drapeau, already responded to Arrington's post on TechCrunch itself. So did Marcien Jenckes, identified by TC as an "AOL spokesman" but actually a senior vice president in charge of some of the company's premiere properties, including AIM and Userplane.
"I want to echo Tom's post," noted Jenckes. "Community has been a core element of both AOL and Netscape since their inception and will continue to be. As the text on the site explains, we wanted to give a more traditional portal alternative to the Netscape users who requested it. You can rest assured that social news will continue to be an important part of what we do."
Netscape doesn't appear to be listed on the AOL.com site map or promoted on the AOL.com website. They may be keeping the brand seperate. The blog post from Netscape should settle any confusion as to whether Netscape will continue its social news community. AOL's fairly recent transition from fee-based service to a ad-based model should mean AOL needs the kind of traffic a social media website can provide.
USA Today has an interesting story about how parents are investigating their college-bound child's future roommate on Facebook. Some of the parents are not liking what they see and are requesting a roommate change with the college.
As housing officials at colleges around the country send out roommate assignments to freshmen this summer, a growing number of schools say they're getting more requests for changes - from parents who don't like the roommates' Facebook profiles.
"They were getting an impression - false or accurate - of what the student would be like to live with," says Magda Manetas of The College of New Jersey in Ewing.
About a dozen other colleges contacted by USA TODAY report similar complaints. And this may be just the beginning: Some schools already have mailed roommate assignments for fall, but many more say they will be sending them out in the next few weeks.
Housing officials say parents who cite Facebook most frequently mention party-related content and photos as their primary concerns. Parents sometimes see cups in photos and make the leap to alcohol and drugs, Manetas says.
But Robin Berkowitz-Smith of Syracuse University says race, religion and sexual orientation are the top three concerns from parents contacting officials there.
Once again social networks are having a major impact on the lives of young adults and their parents. The temptation to investigate their child's future roommate is probably too difficult to avoid. There is the possibility that some of the change requests are being made by the parent on behalf of their child. In this case it may actually prevent a roommate change that would have happened anyway after a difficult first few weeks. There is also simply some nosey parental interference going on here.
The chart below from a ComScore press release (via Read/WriteWeb) shows the amazing growth some of the largest social networks have achieved over the past twelve months.
The list does not include all the social networks only those selected by ComScore that had over 10 million visits and at least 50 percent growth during the past year and are of particular significance to the North American region.
ComScore credits international growth for the large increases in visitors at these social networks. MySpace clearly remains the leader as far as visitors goes. Facebook showed the most impressive growth and Tagged came out of nowhere to be one of the top sites. Friendster and Orkut are still hanging in there with nearly 25 million monthly visitors each.
Discovery Communications has acquired (via paidContent) Treehugger, a popular green news blog founded by Graham Hill. The blog is currently ranked 19th on Technorati and receives 1.4 million visitors per month. Treehugger will become part of Discovery's Planet Green TV network that will launch in 2008.
Discovery Communications, the number-one nonfiction media company, today announced the acquisition of the leading eco-lifestyle website, TreeHugger.com. The interactive site becomes part of Discovery's global multiplatform initiative Planet Green, which includes the first 24/7 eco-lifestyle TV network launching in 50 million homes in early 2008.
The deal brings TreeHugger.com's rich mix of news, blogs and advice to Planet Green and furthers Discovery's previously announced goal of developing original programming related to the environment, sustainable development, conservation and organic living. In acquiring TreeHugger.com, Discovery is pursuing its multiplatform strategy of being the leading content provider across nonfiction genres around the world. The transaction will not have a material impact on earnings in year one.
Terms were not disclosed but a paidContent post says TreeHugger was acquired for around $15 million. Other sources (see here, here, here and here) have put the acquisition figure at $10 million. Discovery wasn't the only company that had approached the popular green blog. In a post on its site TreeHugger says they were "approached by over 15 large companies" over the past year.
In addition to its blog, TreeHugger also has forums, audio and video podcasts, and owns the Digg-like Hugg.com website. Still $10 to $15 million is very impressive for a blog plus a few extras. It was just a couple years ago that the entire Weblogs, Inc. blog network was sold for about $25 million to AOL. Nick Denton who has not sold his Gawker Media blog network is listed as one of the people on TreeHugger's Board of Advisors.
A New York Timesstory has revealed the blogger behind the ultimate character blog - Fake Steve Jobs - is Forbes senior editor Daniel Lyons.
The mysterious writer has used his blog, the Secret Diary of Steve Jobs, to lampoon Mr. Jobs and his reputation as a difficult and egotistical leader, as well as to skewer other high-tech companies, tech journalists, venture capitalists, open-source software fanatics and Silicon Valley's overall aura of excess.
The acerbic postings of "Fake Steve," as he is known, have attracted a plugged-in readership - both the real Mr. Jobs and Bill Gates have acknowledged reading the blog (fakesteve.blogspot.com). At the same time, Fake Steve has evaded the best efforts of Silicon Valley's gossips to discover his real identity.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the country, Daniel Lyons, a senior editor at Forbes magazine who lives near Boston, has been quietly enjoying the attention.
"I'm stunned that it's taken this long," said Mr. Lyons, 46, when a reporter interrupted his vacation in Maine on Sunday to ask him about Fake Steve. "I have not been that good at keeping it a secret. I've been sort of waiting for this call for months."
Mr. Lyons writes and edits technology articles for Forbes and is the author of two works of fiction, most recently a 1998 novel, "Dog Days." In October, Da Capo Press will publish his satirical novel written in the voice of the Fake Steve character, "Options: The Secret Life of Steve Jobs, a Parody."
In a blog post on the Fake Steve blog Lyons credits Brad Stone at the New York Times for discovering his secret identity.
My cover has been blown. Guy named Brad Stone, who works for the New York Times. Have you heard of him? Well, tip of the hat to you, Brad Stone. You did the sleuthing. You put the pieces of the puzzle together. You went through my trash, hacked into my computer, and put listening devices in my home. Now you've ruined the mystery of Fake Steve, robbing thousands of people around the world of their sense of childlike wonder.
Apple 2.0 points out that Brad Stone found style similarities between the Fake Steve blog and in Lyons' Floating Point blog and his upcoming novel, Options: The Secret Life of Steve Jobs, a Parody. This was part of Lyons' undoing. It also isn't easy to keep a secret for very long especially with the Fake Steve Jobs character getting so big. FSJ was even name dropped by Bill Gates at the Gates-Jobs meetup where Gates joked that he was not Fake Steve Jobs.
The big question now is what happens to the blog now? Will it still be a big traffic draw? Scott Karp blogs that the Fake Steve Jobs blog is apparently now going to be published on the Forbes.com website. Forbes itself also has an article about the FSJ blog moving from blogspot to Forbes.com. Duncan Riley blogs at TechCrunch that "Half of the fun related to the blog has been not knowing who the author was." Knowing the real author does take some of the fun out of FSJ so it is difficult to say whether or not this will be a big draw for Forbes.com. Still a character blog from Forbes impersonating a CEO of a major technology company seems hard to completely ignore. Maybe there will also be more interest now in what Daniel Lyons himself has to say in his real columns. For more discussion of the Fake Steve reveal check Techmeme and Megite.
Twitter, Inc., the company behind the popular microblogging and communication tool called Twitter, recently received an infusion of venture capital funding (see here, here, here, here and here). Rex Hammond blogs that "all blog posts about Twitter getting funding should be limited to less than 140 characters" which is a good idea - unfortunately, this post is already well over the limit.
The amount of funding Twitter received was not disclosed. Twitter, Inc. has a post explaining its cash infusion.
First, Twitter was a fun side project, then it was cared for lovingly at Obvious until it was time to form Twitter, Inc. Today, we're excited to announce an important moment for Twitter. We've raised funding from our friends in New York City at Union Square Ventures.
From some of his early writing about Twitter we had a hunch Fred Wilson was someone we'd get along with. After we met with Fred and his team, we knew we wanted to work together. As Fred's written in his post about the news, Twitter is going to use this funding to grow our resources and focus on the important tasks ahead.
To help us achieve these goals we're also working with our old friends out here on the West Coast at Charles River Ventures. In addition, we're honored to include some folks we've been inspired by as angel investors including Marc Andreessen, Dick Costolo, Ron Conway, and Naval Ravikant to name a few.
Union Square Ventures' VC Fred Wilson, who is a Twitterer himself, has a post about the funding on the Union Square Ventures' website.
There are estimated to be 300,000 users on Twitter but this estimate has not been updated in two or three months. Recently, Twitter was where some people first heard about the Minnesota bridge collapse. The Los Angeles Fire Department is also providing updates on its Twitter account.
These are just a few of the many uses for Twitter. The Twitter Fan Wiki keeps a frequently updated list of news services, apps, mashups and other interesting Twitter tools and Twitter accounts. It will be interesting to see what new features and services Twitter adds down the road. The communication tool Twitter offers is what has made it so popular so quickly but ultimately Twitter may add more social networking features like profiles and compete with the larger social networks.
Google has continued to promise sponsors that filtering technology to remove copyrighted content would come to YouTube eventualy. A Times Online article says that technology is expected to arrive in September.
Google has said that it hopes to have technology in place by September that would prevent copyright-infringing videos being posted on YouTube, its video-sharing site.
A lawyer for Google told a judge presiding over a copyright action that YouTube was working "very intensely and co-operating" with content-producing companies to introduce video-recognition technology that would detect illegally copied material before a clip is posted.
At present, companies must find illegally uploaded videos themselves and alert Google, which will then take them down.
Philip Beck, who is representing Google in the action, told a judge in Manhattan that the filtering technology would be introduced "hopefully in September". He said that Google hoped the technology would "eliminate such disputes in the future."
For copyright owners the filter would simplify the problem of copyrighted content continuously reappearing on YouTube even after some instances of it have been removed. For people trying to find videos on YouTube the filter might make it more difficult. Today you can easily find some copyrighted video content on YouTube even if the copyright holders are trying to remove it because people continue to upload the material. This is especially true of video footage that is being widely discussed in blogs and on social media websites. When Beyonce slipped and fell at a concert last week BMG tried to have the video footage removed from YouTube. Many of the videos were removed and a BMG copyright claim appeared instead but if you search Beyonce Falls on YouTube you will have no problem finding a video showing you the incident.
Richard Farmbrough, a 45-year-old technology project manager living in England, is said to be the person with the most Wikipedia entries. Wikipedia is often accused of containing innacurate listings and was even made fun of by Stephen Colbert who coined the term Wikiality. In an interview with Smith Magazine, Farmbrough says he thinks Wikipedia can be a better source of information than a library in some situations.
Do you think Wikipedia is a better source of information than going to the library?
Farmbrough: In some ways. The question only makes sense if you state who is looking for what, and which library is involved. For example, if you have a university library available to you, you will get more and better information on most subjects, except, perhaps, popular culture. If you only have a small-town library, you can probably find out as much or more from Wikipedia on many subjects, but it will be "chunked" differently -- it might not be easy to learn calculus, certainly not Linux or Anglo-Saxon from Wikipedia (although, there are sister wikis which address these types of needs). The Wikipedia community has a strong belief in maintaining the goal of building an encyclopedia, rather than a how-to resource, a dictionary (though there is also Wiktionary) or "an indiscriminate collection of information."
Some of Wikipedia's seven million articles are debated or contested as people often have different takes on what the facts are. However, printed media - books, magazines and journal - may also carry the bias of the author(s). Most of the Wikipedia entries do try to source the facts in the article by linking directly to each source in the References section.
Some who disagreed enough with Wikipedia have even launched their own wiki encyclopedias, like Conservapedia. Stephen Colbert's clever wikiality term now has over 400,000 results on Google. There's even a Wikiality encylcopedia that's dedicated to truthiness.